VAR Review Sparks Uproar

The VAR review of Newcastle's winner against Arsenal has caused uproar among fans and players alike. The decisions made by ref Stuart Attwell and VAR Andy Madley have left many questioning their validity.

Controversial Decisions

On the modern interpretation of the laws, both Kai Havertz and Bruno Guimaraes should probably have been sent off before half-time. Additionally, Anthony Gordon's winning goal for Newcastle may have been disallowed for a foul or handball by Joelinton, as well as potential offside and the ball going out of play.

A Riveting Spectacle

Despite the controversial decisions, both Attwell and Madley managed to keep all 22 players on the pitch, allowing fans to enjoy a feisty and fast-paced game. The match ended with Mikel Arteta venting his frustration about refereeing standards and Jorginho refusing to shake hands with Jamaal Lascelles.

The Impact of VAR

VAR has changed the game of football, raising expectations of officials to unreachable limits. Clubs, like Arsenal, are now making grandstanding public statements, insisting that refereeing standards must be urgently addressed. However, the real issue lies with VAR itself.

VAR Doesn't Work

VAR is causing increased rage and bitterness among players, managers, and fans. Many decisions made by football referees are subjective, and VAR doesn't provide the ultimate justice it promises. It's time to acknowledge that VAR doesn't work and that mistakes are inevitable.

Football as a Game or a Business?

The crux of the matter is whether football should be enjoyed for its spontaneity, intensity, and controversy or treated as a business that demands forensic justice. Clubs like Arsenal and Liverpool, with their American owners, lean towards the latter, while others advocate for the scrapping of VAR in favor of embracing the game's imperfections.

Ultimately, it's up to the fans to decide which option sounds more fun.